Search

Supreme Court rules Elk Grove Village term-limits referendum invalid - Chicago Daily Herald

In a huge victory for long-serving Elk Grove Village Mayor Craig Johnson and his supporters, the Illinois Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that a referendum asking to impose retroactive term limits on him and other village leaders is invalid.

The unanimous decision reverses a Cook County judge's Jan. 15 ruling that found a state law barring retroactive term-limit measures to be unconstitutional. Instead, the high court sided with Elk Grove's electoral board -- and ultimately Gov. J.B. Pritzker -- which upheld an objection to the referendum question on the basis it violated the recently-enacted state law.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Village voters had been set to go to the polls March 17 to vote in the referendum proposed by Tim Burns, a longtime critic of Johnson. It would have asked voters whether the mayor and trustees should be able to serve no more than two consecutive 4-year terms, and if approved, would have barred Johnson and three village trustees from running for reelection in 2021.

Johnson lauded the Supreme Court's ruling.

"Term limits should be a political philosophy. They were using term limits with the retroactive part to make it into a political tool," Johnson said of Burns and other political opponents. "No one wants that."

Reached Wednesday afternoon, Burns said his attorneys would be releasing a statement about the court decision at a later time.

Cook County Clerk's Office officials confirmed that the term limits question -- even if already printed on ballots -- won't count.

James Scalzitti, an office spokesman, said there will be poster-type signage in Elk Grove polling places telling voters that the state Supreme Court invalidated the question and votes won't be counted. Election judges will be instructed to give each voter a printed notice stating the same.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Touch screens used for early voting, which is set to begin Monday, already have been programmed with the Elk Grove question. But election officials can program scanners not to count any of those votes, Scalzitti said.

John Fogarty, attorney for the Johnson-backed Committee to Oppose the Retroactive Term Limits Referendum, was surprised by the speed of the court's decision -- less than a week after a deadline for all parties to submit legal briefs -- though he said it's not unusual for the court to expedite election-related cases as voters get ready to head to the polls.

"It has been before them in some fashion or another for a couple weeks," Fogarty said. "I was a little surprised and obviously pleased, but by the same token the court went straight to the heart of the matter."

The decision came down about four hours before a scheduled town hall meeting hosted by Johnson to dispute anonymous robocalls and mailers directed at him since last summer. He had said the meeting -- inside council chambers at village hall -- wouldn't address the referendum because it's a political matter.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Burns' group, Concerned Citizens of Elk Grove Village, only put out a few mailers and a robocall, and said they weren't affiliated or coordinating with those behind some two dozen other mailers and robocalls.

Since the term limits question would have been a de facto referendum on Johnson and his long-tenured board, the mayor and his supporters spent the last several weeks on what very much was like an election campaign, posting some 1,500 signs in front yards and hosting coffee meetings in homes and local restaurants.

Were the question to have stayed on the ballot, Johnson said it "could have been close" because of the general popularity of term limits. But Johnson and his allies emphasized and branded Burns' proposed referendum as "retroactive."

The strategy may have started to have an effect in voters' minds, and Johnson said he felt "pretty confident" the question would have been defeated at the ballot box.

"From the signs you saw in this community, from the way people were talking, their negative campaign was failing miserably," Johnson said. "The people in this community know me. I was born and raised here and have been mayor for 23 years. They know my record, and I think the people of Elk Grove have a lot of faith in me. But I have to continue to earn their trust every single day."

Johnson, first elected trustee in 1993 and mayor since 1997, hasn't officially announced if he will seek a seventh term as mayor next year next year.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"term" - Google News
February 27, 2020 at 07:45AM
https://ift.tt/381VSGR

Supreme Court rules Elk Grove Village term-limits referendum invalid - Chicago Daily Herald
"term" - Google News
https://ift.tt/35lXs52
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Bagikan Berita Ini

0 Response to "Supreme Court rules Elk Grove Village term-limits referendum invalid - Chicago Daily Herald"

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.