By LARRY VAUGHT
Maybe if former Kentucky basketball players Isaiah Briscoe, Wenyen Gabriel and even EJ Montgomery this year could have had the opportunity to earn money off their name, image and likeness the way college athletes will be able to do the 2021-22 school year they would have stayed at least another year at UK rather than stay in the NBA draft.
Probably could have been the same for other players because if you play basketball at Kentucky, there are going to be financial gains for you.
But what about a sport like softball?
Kentucky coach Rachel Lawson initially said he didn’t know enough about the ruling to offer an educated response.
“Especially in today’s climate, I think the worth of an athlete has gone down significantly because everyone is sitting in their house,” Lawson said.
No doubt COVID-19 would have wiped out financial opportunities now for many athletes if they had been allowed to receive endorsements or other financial incentives.
Lawson is realistic about the limited financial opportunities that figure to be there for her players compared to basketball and football players.
“The opportunity that a softball player has from a financial standpoint, the windfall of graduating from Kentucky, doing everything the right way like meaning your time and putting time into your education – their windfall is going to be hundreds of thousands of dollars, so I think that we do a great job of academic support of explaining that to them,” Lawson said.
“And we have financial literacy programs, too, so if a kid were to skip practice to go make $1,000 or $5,000, their long-term investment is not going to be that great. It’s on people like myself to teach them the cost-benefit analysis to everything and you’ve got to sit down with every player and sit down with them individually and figure out what’s best for them anyways.
“We’re big-time long-term thinkers. That’s why so many of our kids go to med school, grad school, finishing school. You know Bailey Vick had four or five job interviews this January and was offered a job by all five of them (and announced Monday she is taking one of those jobs rather than coming back to UK for another season). So that will be a huge windfall for her moving forward.”
Lawson said her priority will remain “long-term” earnings for her players.
“Like I tell all of our student-athletes, the only true independence in this world is financial. You don’t want to suffer, make a quick buck to suffer what you could earn on the tail end. And to be honest, that’s the crux of our softball team. People say this, but we truly are academic first, softball second and sometimes that gets in the way of softball, but we would never, ever, ever, ever sacrifice a win for some of these long-term gains,” Lawson.
Not sure about you, but Lawson’s advice is something football and basketball players might need to remember going forward, too, when short-term temptation/gain might not offset what is best long term. Seems that’s why incoming UK freshman basketball player Terrence Clarke is banking on by saying no to the G League dollars to spend next season at UK.
"term" - Google News
May 06, 2020 at 01:11AM
https://ift.tt/3bb3YOS
How will college athletes balance short-term gains with long-term security? - Vaught's Views
"term" - Google News
https://ift.tt/35lXs52
https://ift.tt/2L1ho5r
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "How will college athletes balance short-term gains with long-term security? - Vaught's Views"
Post a Comment